'A Comparison of Democratization Process in China and India\r'

'The bourne â€Å" nation” first emerged in the societies of ancient Greece where it is meant to be a form of decision-making where the community is allowed to participate, which later on served as the system used for g overnance (Woolf & antiophthalmic fixings; Rawcliffe, 2005). Bryce (2009) noted that the term is used to describe the tycoon that is legally dress hatowed by the pile to the judicature.Likewise, the term â€Å"people” moved farther away from the privileged a couple of(prenominal) and concentrateed more on the entire community. As a result, the consideration for the rights and the voice of the citizens became a primal theme in democratic giving medications.Aside from the political aspects of democracy, the slack market structure is also an element that has stupefy inseparable from that of democracy (as cited in Snauwaert, 1993). In the publish market system, the government has less control over the affairs of the market and individuals be g iven the scene to choose among several options (Snauwaert, 1993).In the insert day, democracy has baffle a very popular system of government as the West and other advocates continue to add up it as a suitable form of administration the inn. Based on the arguments of Francis Fukuyama, a resolution is reached computeing the best way to organize the political and economic aspects of the society and suggested democracy as the answer.In addition, Fukuyama contends that â€Å"democracy, in the political realm, and markets, in the economic realm, had triumphed over all challengers and were in the cognitive process of becoming the universal forms of political and economic administration” (Bova, 2003, p. 243).In history, nations did not immediately employ democracy. Some require taken other paths, such as India and mainland china that experienced the colonial precept and Communist rule, respectively. twain countries have experienced undergoing a process of democratization , which is express to â€Å"[begin] when the principle of citizenship is acknowledged by a governing in certain ways by allowing the electric resistance to become involved in politics” (Des Forges, Luo, & amp; Wu, 1993, p. 231).In addition, the democratization process proceeds from the distribution of creator and responsibilities throughout the community (Des Forges, Luo, & Wu, 1993).From the previous systems of government, India proven that it can undergo the process of democratization and ingest it until 50 years after. On the other hand, china remains a communist state amidst its inconstant attempts to apply several democratic principles from the West (Central knowledge Agency [CIA], 2010; He & Feng, 2008).The twain countries, China and India, are both Asian countries that are breed hard to apply and implement the concepts of democracy as it is observed from the Western ideals.The interesting experiences of the two nations with regard to the process of de mocratization serve as the focus of the present paper, which would also highlight the differences and similarities between the experiences of the two nations. In so doing, tension is placed on theDemocratization Process in IndiaNational ProfileIndia is a member of the grey Asian region and has a total empyrean of 3,165,596 sq km (Oldenburg, 2008). The 7 union territories and 28 states are ruled by a President, who is the head of state, and a Prime Minster, who serves as the head of government (Oldenburg, 2008).The present form of government is Federal Republic and is governed by the Constitution that was amended last 2002 (Oldenburg, 2008). India also has an be legislature, which is composed of the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) (Oldenburg, 2008). The Judicial branch of the Indian government is headed by the Supreme Court (Oldenburg, 2008).For a protracted period of time until 1947, India was subjected to British colonial rule (Mishar, 2 000). The democracy gained independence through the Indian independency Act, which received the Royal Assent on 1947 (Mishra, 2000).The Indian Independence Act served as an important factor in the process of democratization in the country because it gave way for a Provisional government that would later on take the form of a democracy. At the day when the said Act took into effect, Jawaharlal Nehru said that it is a time when â€Å"India discovers herself again,” (as cited in Hukam, 2005, pp. 309-10).In relation to this, it is important to nominate the events surrounding before and after the promulgation of the Indian Independence Act in 1947 and the progress towards democracy that was made up to the present time. More specifically, emphasis is placed on the economic and political changes in the country and the actors and elements that allowed for successful democratization.\r\n'