.

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Testing A Tool(form) To Prevent Dvt In Hospitalized Patients

Back ground of the problemDVT- Deep Vein Thrombosis occurs when a blood kinship clot jumps in the thigh muscles or in the veins or calf . This leads to pulmonary embolism in which the clotted stock certificate moves and travels from the tholes to the lungs which is a more serious problemPain , redness and swelling in the affected ara , fever and joint pain be the DVT symptoms . still sometimes symptoms sternnot be found openly . scarcely these are preventable problems that evict increase mortality . advance(prenominal) sound judgment and recognition of danger as well as initiating capture prevention measures do-nothing prevent DVT or PEProblem StatementThere is gigantic scientific debate as to how great the take a chance of DVT is from desire place blood travel , not moving for a capacious time - as occurs durin g ample journeys by air , equipage or car - is k forthwithn to be associated with an change magnitude risk of DVT . When some bingle is sitting down for a long time their blood tends to pool in their lower leg veins causing swelling and increasing the chance that the blood exhalation clot and form a DVTDVT isn t something to be alarmed beloved and maybe less common , but by public aware and taking simple precautions when flying , the risk can be reducedPurpose of the studyThe purpose of this research project is to test a DVT risk sagaciousness tool and verify the tools validity and whether it is bona fide or notRationale and theoretical stem turn for investigationThe approach to test the DVT risk assessment tool can be divided into triplet phasesThe setoff phase is to perform a through lit come after to investigate and communicate a clear conception of risk and predisposing factors for DVT .

Expert nursing knowledge and medical rung remark would be helpfulThe second phase is to concentrate on the gunpoint development and weightingThe third phase should measure the differences in stiff assessment tool score between both contrastive groups of patients - one group who developed DVT in the infirmary and the another(prenominal) group under the same scenario who did not develop DVT . This is metrical by parametric testing for content validityNow , the secrete rater dependability should be measured by taking three nurses as a group and each group great(p) score to one patient and compare the differences in scores of each idiosyncratic nurse in the groupDerivation of conclusionIf the lay rater reliability showed a stiff correlation among the scores of the three nurses , we can conlude that the DVT group had significantly higher scores than did those who did not scram DVT Nurses can now evaluate patients at risk for DVT or PEResearch QuestionsHow easily this inter rater reliability can be measuredCan the rationale and theoretical base for investigation be enhancedReferencesWorldviews on Evidence-Based treat . Volume 4 Issue 1 Page 14-20 , work on 2007CitationsHYPERLINK http / meshwork .bupa .co .uk /health_information /html /health_news /110703dvt .htm l http /www .bupa .co .uk /health_information /html /health_news /110703dvt .html PAGEPAGE 1Testing...If you want to get a full essay, hostelry it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment